Phillip Warren Roberts v. State

Phillip Warren Roberts v. State






IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS


No. 10-04-00023-CR


     PHILLIP WARREN ROBERTS,

                                                                              Appellant

     v.


     THE STATE OF TEXAS,

                                                                              Appellee


From the 54th District Court

McLennan County, Texas

Trial Court # 2000-631-C

                                                                                                                

DISSENTING OPINION

                                                                                                                

      Until the precedential value of Gray and Emich are established, I note my dissent to the affirmance of the trial court's judgment, which we have not reviewed, when dismissal is the proper disposition of this appeal. See Gray v. State, 10-02-00176-CR, 2004 Tex. App. LEXIS 2603 (Tex. App.—Waco March 17, 2004, no pet. h.)(Gray, C.J., dissenting); Emich v. State, 10-02-00319-CR, 2004 Tex. App. LEXIS 2597 (Tex. App.—Waco March 17, 2004, no pet. h.)(Gray, C.J., dissenting). Interestingly, the majority attempts to bolster its position that affirming the judgment is the proper disposition by citing the 1979 Court of Criminal Appeals opinion, Williams v. State. See Williams v. State, 592 S.W.2d 931 (Tex. Crim. App. 1979). The distinct difference between Williams and this case is that, in Williams, the Court of Criminal Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error. Id. at 933. In this case, we did not.

      Thus, I respectfully dissent.



                                                                   TOM GRAY

                                                                   Chief Justice


Dissenting opinion delivered and filed May 26, 2004

Publish