Mark Manly, Individually and D/B/A Agri-Safe v. CR Minerals Company

 

IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

 


No. 10-03-00114-CV

 

Mark Manly, Individually and d/b/a Agri-Safe,

                                                                      Appellant

 v.

 

CR Minerals Company,

                                                                      Appellee

 

 

 


From the 74th District Court

McLennan County, Texas

Trial Court # 2000-2726-3

 

MEMORANDUM  Opinion

 


      This is an appeal of a suit on a sworn account.  See Tex. R. Civ. P. 185.  Because there is no evidence that Manly was acting in any capacity other than as an employee in the purchase of the products from CR Minerals, we reverse and render.

      In Manly’s second issue, he contends that the evidence was legally insufficient.  The trial court rendered judgment against Manly, individually, and doing business as Agri-Safe.  Manly pleaded that he was a stranger to the transaction, and put on evidence to that effect.  See Weaver v. King Ready Mix Concrete, Inc., 750 S.W.2d 913, 914 (Tex. App.—Waco 1988, no writ).  Manly put on evidence that Agri-Safe was a marketing division of EPA Distributors, a corporation owned by his father, by which Manly was employed and in which he owned no interest.  Manly testified that he had never done business as Agri-Safe, did not purchase goods from Appellee individually, and did not agree to be responsible for the purchases.  CR Minerals introduced evidence that Manly had signed a license application on behalf of Agri-Safe in which he affirmed that he was “authorized and empowered to act for the operation for whom the license application is made.”  CR Minerals also points to Manly’s testimony that he placed the orders for the goods.  But as CR Minerals’ brief notes, its invoices that form the basis of its sworn account name Agri-Safe as the purchaser.  Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the trial court’s implied finding that Manly was a party to the transaction, and disregarding disputed evidence to the contrary except for undisputed evidence, there is no evidence that Manly was a party to the transaction.  See St. Joseph Hosp. v. Wolff, 94 S.W.3d 513, 519-20 (Tex. 2003); Tiller v. McLure, 121 S.W.3d 709, 713 (Tex. 2003); Weaver at 914.  We sustain Manly’s second issue.  We reverse and render judgment that CR Minerals take nothing from Manly, individually, and doing business as Agri-Safe.  We do not reach Manly’s other issues.

TOM GRAY

Chief Justice

Before Chief Justice Gray,

      Justice Vance, and

      Justice Reyna

Opinion delivered and filed January 26, 2005

Reversed and rendered

[CV06]