Joe L. Sanders, Jr. and Wife Kathy F. Sanders v. Household Mortgage Services, Inc. and Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc.

 

IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

 

No. 10-07-00233-CV

 

Joe L. Sanders, Jr. and Wife

Kathy F. Sanders,

                                                                                    Appellants

 v.

 

HOUSEHOLD MORTGAGE SERVICES, INC.

AND Mortgage Electronic Registration

Systems, Inc.,

                                                                                    Appellees

 

 


From the 19th District Court

McLennan County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2005-2618-1

 

abatement for mediation ORDER


 

            Appellants, Joe and Kathy Sanders, noted in their docketing statement filed on August 13, 2007 that this appeal may be appropriate for mediation, a form of alternative dispute resolution.

            The Legislature has provided for the resolution of disputes through alternative dispute resolution (ADR) procedures.  See Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code Ann. §§ 154.001-154.073 (Vernon 2005).  The policy behind ADR is stated in the statute: “It is the policy of this state to encourage the peaceable resolution of disputes . . . and the early settlement of pending litigation through voluntary settlement procedures.”  Id. § 154.002 (Vernon 2005).  Mediation is a form of ADR.  Mediation is a mandatory but non-binding settlement conference, conducted with the assistance of a mediator.  Mediation is private, confidential, and privileged.

            We find that this appeal is appropriate for mediation.  See id. § 154.021(a) (Vernon 2005); 10th Tex. App. (Waco) Loc. R. 9.

            The parties are ordered to confer and attempt to agree upon a mediator.  Within fourteen days after the date of this Order, Appellants are ordered to file a notice with the Clerk of this Court which either identifies the agreed-upon mediator or states that the parties are unable to agree upon a mediator.  If the notice states that the parties are unable to agree upon a mediator, this Court will assign a mediator.

            Mediation must occur within thirty days after the date the above-referenced notice agreeing to a mediator is filed or, if no mediator is agreed upon, within thirty days after the date of the order assigning a mediator.

            Before the first scheduled mediation session, each party must provide the mediator and all other parties with an information sheet setting forth the party’s positions about the issues that need to be resolved.  At or before the first session, all parties must produce all information necessary for the mediator to understand the issues presented.  The mediator may require any party to supplement the information required by this Order.

            Named parties must be present during the entire mediation process, and each corporate party must be represented by a corporate employee, officer, or agent with authority to bind the corporate party to settlement.

            Immediately after mediation, the mediator must advise this Court, in writing, only that the case did or did not settle and the amount of the mediator’s fee paid by each party.  The mediator’s fees will be taxed as costs.  Unless the mediator agrees to mediate without fee, the mediator must negotiate a reasonable fee with the parties, and the parties must each pay one-half of the agreed-upon fee directly to the mediator.

            Failure or refusal to attend the mediation as scheduled may result in the imposition of sanctions, as permitted by law. 

            Any objection to this Order must be filed with this Court and served upon all parties within ten days after the date of this Order, or it is waived.

            We abate this appeal for mediation.

 

                                                                        PER CURIAM

 

 

Before Chief Justice Gray,

            Justice Vance, and

            Justice Reyna

Appeal abated

Order issued and filed August 22, 2007

Do not publish