IN THE
TENTH COURT OF APPEALS
No. 10-09-00142-CV
HUBERT WARREN,
Appellant
v.
THE STATE OF TEXAS,
Appellee
From the 40th District Court
Ellis County, Texas
Trial Court No. 25048 CR
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Appellant Hubert Warren, pro se, purports to be appealing a civil action from the
trial court relating to “Jurisdiction and Venue, Motion for Mistrial for Abuse of
Discretion” filed under the same cause number as his disposed criminal matter. See
Warren v. State, 98 S.W.3d 739 (Tex. App.—Waco 2003, pet. ref’d) (trial court cause no.
25048 CR).
On May 28, 2009, we notified Warren that this court may not have jurisdiction
over this appeal because it appears that he is appealing an interlocutory, nonappealable
order. See TEX. CIV. PRAC. & REM. CODE ANN. § 51.014 (Vernon 2008) (listing types of
appealable interlocutory orders). We stated that the appeal would be dismissed for
want of jurisdiction unless Warren filed within twenty-one days a response showing
grounds for continuing the appeal and he provided the court a copy of the order or
judgment being appealed. Warren has not done either.
We dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(a), 43.2(f).
REX D. DAVIS
Justice
Before Chief Justice Gray,
Justice Reyna, and
Justice Davis
Dismissed
Opinion delivered and filed July 1, 2009
[CV06]
Warren v. State Page 2