11th Court of Appeals
Eastland, Texas
Opinion
Bobby Ray Crain
Appellant
Vs. Nos. 11-02-00135-CR, 11-02-00136-CR, 11-02-00137-CR, & 11-02-00138-CR -- Appeals from Dallas County
State of Texas
Appellee
The jury convicted Bobby Ray Crain of the following offenses: indecency with a child in Cause Nos. 11-02-00135-CR and 11-02-00136-CR; aggravated sexual assault of a child under the age of 14 in Cause No. 11-02-00137-CR; and sexual assault of a child in Cause No. 11-02-00138-CR. For the aggravated sexual assault conviction, the jury assessed appellant=s punishment at confinement for 25 years. For the other three convictions, the jury assessed his punishment at confinement for 5 years. The punishments are to run concurrently. Appellant appeals his convictions. We affirm.
In his sole point of error in each case, appellant argues that the evidence was factually insufficient to prove his guilt. Specifically, appellant refers to the lack of physical evidence and the weaknesses and inconsistencies in the State=s evidence. In order to determine if the evidence is factually sufficient, we must review all of the evidence in a neutral light and determine whether the evidence supporting guilt is so weak as to render the conviction clearly wrong and manifestly unjust or whether the evidence supporting guilt, although adequate when taken alone, is so greatly outweighed by the overwhelming weight of contrary evidence as to render the conviction clearly wrong and manifestly unjust. Vasquez v. State, 67 S.W.3d 229, 236 (Tex.Cr.App.2002); Goodman v. State, 66 S.W.3d 283 (Tex.Cr.App.2001); Johnson v. State, 23 S.W.3d 1, 11 (Tex.Cr.App.2000); Cain v. State, 958 S.W.2d 404 (Tex.Cr.App.1997); Clewis v. State, 922 S.W.2d 126 (Tex.Cr.App.1996). We note also that the jury, as the trier of fact, was the sole judge of the credibility of the witnesses and of the weight to be given to their testimony. TEX. CODE CRIM. PRO. ANN. arts. 36.13 & 38.04 (Vernon 1979 & 1981).
The record shows that appellant was charged and convicted of indecency with a child for engaging in sexual contact with his daughter, K.W., and his daughter=s half-sister, T.W. (whom he also raised), by touching their breasts with his hands. Appellant was also charged and convicted of the aggravated sexual assault of T.W. by penetrating her sexual organ with his sexual organ when she was under the age of 14. Finally, appellant was charged and convicted of the sexual assault of T.W. by penetrating her mouth with his sexual organ.
At the time of the trial, K.W. was 12 years old and T.W. was 16 years old. K.W. testified that she went to visit appellant during spring break in 2001. Appellant was living with his sister, Patricia Ann Crain. K.W. arrived on Saturday and planned to spend the whole week. However, appellant=s behavior after coming in from a party on Saturday night caused K.W. to leave early. K.W. testified that, after she and her younger sister went to sleep on adjacent couches in the living room, she was awakened at about 3:00 a.m. by appellant. He was touching her breast, over her clothes, with his hand. K.W. testified that appellant was lying where her younger sister had been sleeping and that appellant had moved K.W.=s younger sister to another couch. When appellant touched K.W.=s breast, it scared her. K.W. jumped up but then lay back down. Appellant then reached his hand over again, and K.W. jumped up and went to the restroom. When she came out of the restroom, she noticed that appellant was not wearing any clothes but was trying to cover himself with a blanket. Appellant asked K.W. if she wanted to watch television. K.W. answered negatively and then went to her Aunt Patricia=s room where she slept for the rest of the night. The next day, K.W. called her mother and asked her to come pick her up and take her home. K.W. was crying.
K.W.=s mother, K.W.=s stepfather, and T.W. all asked K.W. what was wrong, but all she told them at the time was that appellant Awas playing too much.@ That evening after they returned home, K.W.=s mother and stepfather called her into their room to discuss things. K.W. told them what had happened. Her mother ultimately called the police. Subsequently, while K.W. was going through counseling, K.W. told her counselor that she had seen appellant in sexual encounters with T.W.
K.W. testified at trial that, one time when her younger sister opened the door to appellant=s bedroom, she saw T.W. Aover [appellant=s] face.@ They were on the bed, and T.W. did not have on any pants or panties. On another occasion, appellant had sent K.W., her brother, and her younger sister outside, which he did often, keeping T.W. inside with him. While she was outside, K.W. saw appellant and T.W. through the window. T.W. was sitting on the couch; appellant was on his knees on the floor situated between her legs and facing her. Appellant=s hands were on T.W.=s thighs, and K.W. saw him Apush up@ from his waist.
T.W. also testified about her encounters with appellant. The first time something happened between them, T.W. was 11 years old. While she was asleep, appellant reached under the blanket and touched her breasts. Appellant did that on more than one occasion. Appellant then progressed to Agoing under [her] shirt@ and, eventually, to having sex with her. T.W. recalled that she was 12 years old the first time appellant penetrated her. T.W.=s mother was at work. Appellant sent the younger children outside and took T.W. into his bedroom. Appellant put T.W. on the bed and told her that he was going to have sex with her and that she should not tell anybody. Appellant took off T.W.=s gown, took off his clothes, pulled T.W.=s underwear aside, and had sex with her by placing his penis into her vagina. T.W.=s statement indicated that the pain was Aexcruciating,@ that she had a blood stain in her underwear, and that it hurt to walk. According to T.W., appellant sexually assaulted her many times. T.W. also testified that appellant Aperformed oral sex on [her]@ and that, when she was 13 or 14 years old, appellant placed his penis in her mouth. T.W. recalled one occasion in particular when she told appellant Ano@ and tried to walk out of the house. Appellant slammed her hand in the door and then hit her in the face. T.W. attempted to fight back.
When she was 13 years old, T.W. contracted a sexually transmitted disease from her father. However, because she was afraid to tell anyone that appellant was molesting her and because appellant was at the hospital with her and her mother, T.W. said that some boy had given her the disease. T.W. testified that appellant was the only person during that time with whom she had Ahad sex.@ Even after K.W. came forward and told about appellant=s behavior, T.W. denied that anything had happened between her and appellant. Eventually, however, she made an outcry to her mother but did not tell her mother everything because her mother started crying.
The victims= mother testified at trial. She testified regarding K.W.=s outcry, which was substantially similar to K.W.=s testimony at trial. The victims= mother also testified that T.W. subsequently admitted the abuse -- but only after being confronted with the fact that K.W. had reported to her therapist that K.W. had seen appellant abusing T.W. Detective Patricia SanMartino testified regarding T.W.=s outcry.
Joanna Elaine Bass Parker testified that she had observed appellant behaving inappropriately with T.W. when T.W. was about ten years old. Parker worked with appellant and the victims= mother. Parker saw appellant leaning over in the car kissing T.W.=s neck. Parker also noticed that, while T.W. was outside playing, appellant would grab her or hug her from behind and that his hands Awould always land either on her upper private part@ or Abelow her belly button@ in her Aprivate area.@
Appellant=s sister, Patricia, testified and corroborated K.W.=s testimony as far as coming to visit for spring break, leaving early, and coming into Patricia=s bedroom to sleep. However, Patricia did not think that K.W. was acting strangely. Appellant testified and denied the allegations made against him. Appellant testified that K.W. and T.W. were accusing him of Asexual abuse to get [their younger sister] back.@
We hold that the evidence is factually sufficient to support appellant=s conviction of each offense. The evidence supporting appellant=s guilt is neither so weak nor so greatly outweighed by contrary evidence as to render any of the convictions clearly wrong and manifestly unjust. Appellant=s sole point of error is overruled.
The judgments of the trial court are affirmed.
PER CURIAM
July 24, 2003
Do not publish. See TEX.R.APP.P. 47.2(b).
Panel consists of: Arnot, C.J., and
Wright, J., and McCall, J.