IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 02-20170
Summary Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
RICKY LAMAR FAULK,
Defendant-Appellant.
--------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Texas
USDC No. H-00-CR-871-2
--------------------
October 17, 2002
Before BARKSDALE, DeMOSS, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Ricky Lamar Faulk appeals the sentence he received after he
pleaded guilty to conspiracy to manufacture methamphetamine and
to obstruction of justice in violation of 18 U.S.C.
§ 1503(a)(b)(3) and 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1), (b)(1)(C), and 846.
Faulk’s argument that the district court erred when it attributed
1.4 grams of methamphetamine to him without a finding of facts on
the record given that no drug amount was set forth in the
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
No. 02-20170
-2-
indictment fails because his sentence was within the statutory
maximum. United States v. Clinton, 256 F.3d 311, 314 (5th Cir.),
cert. denied, 122 S. Ct. 492 (2001). Likewise, Faulk’s argument
that the district court did not comply with FED. R. CRIM. P. 32
because it did not make fact findings on the quantity of drugs
attributable to Faulk fails because the district court expressly
adopted the Presentence Report which clearly set forth the basis
for the amount of drugs attributable to Faulk. United States v.
Duncan, 191 F.3d 575-76 (5th Cir. 1999).
Faulk’s motion to adopt the brief of his codefendant, Steve
Keel, is DENIED. The sentence imposed by the district court is
AFFIRMED.