|
|
|
|
Opinion filed June 11, 2009
In The
Eleventh Court of Appeals
___________
Nos. 11-08-00039-CR & 11-08-00040-CR
__________
TAMMY CARSON ROGERS, Appellant
V.
STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
On Appeal from the 42nd District Court
Taylor County, Texas
Trial Court Cause Nos. 23022A & 23147A
M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N
The trial court convicted Tammy Carson Rogers, upon her plea of guilty, of the offenses of credit card abuse[1] and forgery.[2] Plea bargain agreements were not reached. In each case, the trial court sentenced appellant to confinement in a state jail facility for eighteen months. We affirm.
In her sole issue in each case, appellant invites this court to reconsider our decisions in Flores v. State, 936 S.W.2d 478 (Tex. App.CEastland 1996, pet. ref=d), and Bradfield v. State, 42 S.W.3d 350 (Tex. App.CEastland 2001, pet. ref=d), where we held that punishment assessed was not subject to a factual sufficiency review. We decline appellant=s invitation. Each issue is overruled.
A penalty assessed within the range of punishment established by the legislature will not be disturbed on appeal. Jackson v. State, 680 S.W.2d 809 (Tex. Crim. App. 1984); Bradfield, 42 S.W.3d at 354. The trial court assessed punishment within the range authorized. Tex. Penal Code Ann. '' 12.35, 32.21, 32.31 (Vernon Supp. 2008).
The judgments of the trial court are affirmed.
JIM R. WRIGHT
CHIEF JUSTICE
June 11, 2009
Do not publish. See Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).
Panel consists of: Wright, C.J.,
McCall, J., and Strange, J.
[1]Cause No. 11-08-00039-CR.
[2]Cause No. 11-08-00040-CR.