NO. 12-04-00331-CV
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS
TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT
TYLER, TEXAS
DR. ROBERT GRUEBEL, § APPEAL FROM THE
APPELLANT
V.
ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT OF
THE CITY OF NACOGDOCHES, TEXAS; § COUNTY COURT AT LAW
CONSISTING OF PAUL SMITH,
U.L. WOODSON, JEFF OPPERMAN,
KELLY JONES, RICHARD HUMPHREYS,
CITY OF NACOGDOCHES, TEXAS AND
ARON KULHAVY, CITY PLANNER FOR THE
CITY OF NACOGDOCHES, TEXAS,
APPELLEES § NACOGDOCHES COUNTY, TEXAS
MEMORANDUM OPINION
PER CURIAM
Dr. Robert Gruebel, Appellant, has filed a motion to dismiss this appeal, and all other parties to the appeal have been given notice of the filing of this motion. In his motion, Dr. Gruebel represents that he no longer wishes to pursue this appeal. Because Dr. Gruebel has met the requirements of Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.1(a)(1), the motion is granted, and the appeal is dismissed.
Opinion delivered January 26, 2005.
Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Griffith, J., and DeVasto, J.
(PUBLISH)
COURT OF APPEALS
TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT OF TEXAS
JUDGMENT
JANUARY 26, 2005
NO. 12-04-00331-CV
DR. ROBERT GRUEBEL,
Appellant
V.
ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT OF THE CITY OF NACOGDOCHES, TEXAS;
CONSISTING OF PAUL SMITH, U.L. WOODSON, JEFF OPPERMAN,
KELLY JONES, RICHARD HUMPHREYS, CITY OF NACOGDOCHES, TEXAS AND
ARON KULHAVY, CITY PLANNER FOR THE CITY OF NACOGDOCHES, TEXAS,
Appellees
Appeal from the County Court at Law
of Nacogdoches County, Texas. (Tr.Ct.No. 10651)
THIS CAUSE came to be heard on the appellate record; and the same being inspected, it is the opinion of this court that this court is without jurisdiction of the appeal, and that the appeal should be dismissed.
It is therefore ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED by the court that this appeal be, and the same is, hereby dismissed; and that this decision be certified to the court below for observance.
By per curiam opinion.
Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Griffith, J., and DeVasto, J.