NO. 12-06-00015-CV
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS
TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT
TYLER, TEXAS
TROY RANDELL EDMON, § APPEAL FROM THE 87TH
APPELLANT
V. § JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF
WAYNE E. WHITTEN AND
DAVID GREEN, § ANDERSON COUNTY, TEXAS
APPELLEES
MEMORANDUM OPINION
PER CURIAM
This appeal is being dismissed for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(b). Appellant perfected his appeal on December 27, 2005. Thereafter, the clerk’s record was filed on January 30, 2006, making Appellant’s brief due on or before March 1, 2006. When Appellant failed to file his brief within the required time, this Court notified him on March 10, 2006 that the brief was past due and warned that the appeal would be dismissed for want of prosecution if no motion for extension of time to file the brief was filed by March 20, 2006. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(b). The notice further informed Appellant that the motion for extension of time must contain a reasonable explanation for his failure to file the brief and a showing that Appellees had not suffered material injury thereby.
On March 22, 2006, Appellant filed a motion to accelerate the appeal pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 28.3. In his motion, Appellant states that Rule 28.3 permits an appeal to be heard on the original papers forwarded by the trial court or on sworn and uncontroverted copies of those papers. Appellant appears to conclude that where no appellate brief is filed in a civil case, Rule 28.3 authorizes us to review the record and decide the merits of the appeal. Appellant misinterprets the rule. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a). Because Appellant has not complied with our March 10, 2006 notice, the appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution, and we take no action on Appellant’s motion to accelerate the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a)(1); 42.3.(b).
Opinion delivered March 31, 2006.
Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Griffith, J., and DeVasto, J.
(PUBLISH)