Subscription Television, Inc. And Subscription Television of California, Inc. v. United States District Court for the Central District of California, and the Honorable Manuel L. Real, United States District Judge for the Central District of California, Southern California Theatre Owners Association, Real Parties in Interest

Check Treatment

Related Cases

Southern California Theatre Owners Ass'n v. United States District Court for the Central District of California
Subscription Television, Inc., a Corporation, Subscription Television of California, Inc., a Corporation, Tolvision of America, Inc., a Corporation v. Southern California Theatre Owners Association, a Corporation, Northern California Theatre Owners, Inc., a Corporation, Theatre Owners of America, a Corporation, Allied States National Exhibitors Organizations, California Crusade for Free Tv, a Corporation, Amusement Corporation of America, a Corporation, United California Theatres, Inc., a Corporation, United Artists Theatre Circuit, Inc., a Corporation, Pacific Drive-In Theatres Corp., a Corporation, Fox West Coast Theatres Corporation, a Corporation, American Broadcasting-Paramount Theatres, Inc., a Corporation, National General Corporation, a Corporation, Sero Amusement Company, a Corporation, Rko Theatres, Inc., a Corporation, Stanley Warner Corporation, a Corporation, Stanley Warner Management Corporation, a Corporation, Warner Theatres, Inc., a Corporation, Roy C. Cooper, Arnold C. Childhouse, Graham Kisslingbury, Subscription Television, Inc., a Corporation, Subscription Television of California, Inc., a Corporation, Tolvision of America, Inc., a Corporation v. Southern California Theatre Owners Association, a Corporation, Northern California Theatre Owners, Inc., a Corporation, Theatre Owners of America, a Corporation, Allied States National Exhibitors Organizations, California Crusade for Free Tv, a Corporation, Amusement Corporation of America, a Corporation, United California Theatres, Inc., a Corporation, United Artists Theatre Circuit, Inc., a Corporation, Pacific Drive-In Theatres Corp., a Corporation, Fox West Coast Theatres Corporation, a Corporation, American Broadcasting-Paramount Theatres, Inc., a Corporation, National General Corporation, a Corporation, Sero Amusement Company, a Corporation, Rko Theatres, Inc., a Corporation, Stanley Warner Corporation, a Corporation, Stanley Warner Management Corporation, a Corporation, Warner Theatres, Inc., a Corporation, Roy C. Cooper, Arnold C. Childhouse, Graham Kisslingbury
Southern California Theatre Owners Association v. United States District Court for the Central District of California, and the Honorable Manuel L. Real, United States District Judge for the Central District of California, and Subscription Television, Inc., and Subscription Television of California, Inc., Real Parties in Interest
National Subscription Television v. Formula International, Inc.
National Subscription Television, and Oak Broadcasting Systems, Inc. v. S & H Tv, Jkl Electronics, Jon Karl Larson, R & R Associates, Richard L. Rathburn, Richard Rath, Jk Electronics, Jacqueline M. Kennedy, Kenneth J. Kennedy, Scr Electronics, Stephen Robbins, J & R Electronics v. Defrancisco, Video Movie House, Rich Minard, and Maury Goldstein

430 F.2d 957

SUBSCRIPTION TELEVISION, INC. and Subscription Television of
California, Inc., Petitioners,
v.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR the CENTRAL DISTRICT OF
CALIFORNIA, and The Honorable Manuel L. Real, United States
District Judge for the Central District of California,
Respondents, SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA THEATRE OWNERS ASSOCIATION
et al., Real Parties in Interest.

No. 25626.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

June 29, 1970.

Max L. Gellam (argued), John R. Light, of Latham & Watkins of Los Angeles, Cal., for appellants.

William M. Byrne, Jr., U.S. Atty., Manuel L. Real, USDJ, Los Angeles, Cal., for appellees.

Allan Albala (argued) and Harry G. Swerdlow (argued), of Swerdlow, Glickbarg & Shimer, Beverly Hills, Cal., for real parties in interest.

Before BROWNING, HUFSTEDLER and WRIGHT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

1

Petitioner asks review of a discovery order. There is no showing of irreparable injury. Cf. Hartley Pen Co. v. United States District Court, 287 F.2d 324 (9th Cir. 1961).

2

Petition denied.