Horace Lamar Watkins v. State of Texas

 

 

 

         

              

                  

                               

                                   NUMBER 13-01-302-CR

 

                             COURT OF APPEALS

 

                   THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

 

                                CORPUS CHRISTI

____________________________________________________________________

 

HORACE LAMAR WATKINS,                                                  Appellant,

 

                                                   v.

 

THE STATE OF TEXAS,                                                          Appellee.

____________________________________________________________________

 

                        On appeal from the 197th  District Court

                                 of Cameron County, Texas.

____________________________________________________________________

 

                            O P I N I O N

 

                   Before Justices Dorsey, Rodriguez, and Castillo

                                       Opinion Per Curiam

 

Appellant, HORACE LAMAR WATKINS, attempted to perfect an appeal from an order denying second motion to set aside sentence entered by the 197th District Court of Cameron County, Texas, in cause no. 90-CR-814-C.


Upon review of the notice of appeal and documents filed by appellant, it appeared that an appeal was not timely perfected and, further, that the order from which this appeal was taken was not an appealable order.  Pursuant to Tex. R. App. P. 42.3, notice of this defect was given so that steps could be taken to correct the defect, if it could be done.  Appellant was advised that, if this defect was not corrected within ten days from the date of receipt of this Court=s notice, the appeal would be dismissed.   On May 23, 2001, appellant filed a motion to perfect.

The Court, having considered the documents on file and appellant=s motion to perfect, is of the opinion that the appeal should be dismissed for want of jurisdiction.  Appellant=s motion to perfect is DENIED.   The appeal is hereby DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION.

PER CURIAM

Do not publish.

Tex. R. App. P. 47.3.

 

Opinion delivered and filed this

the 21st  day of November, 2001.