David Horton v. Ginny Byerley and Harris Byerley







NUMBER 13-02-546-CV


COURT OF APPEALS


THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS


CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

____________________________________________________________________


DAVID HORTON,                                                              Appellant,


v.


GINNY BYERLEY AND HARRIS BYERLEY,                            Appellees.

____________________________________________________________________


On appeal from County Court at Law No. 2

of Cameron County, Texas.

____________________________________________________________________


MEMORANDUM OPINION


Before Justices Rodriguez, Castillo, and Garza

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam


         Appellant, DAVID HORTON, perfected an appeal from a judgment entered by County Court at Law No. 2 of Cameron County, Texas, in cause number 2000-CCL-539-B. The clerk’s record was filed on April 21, 2003. No reporter’s record was filed. Appellant’s brief was due on May 21, 2003. To date, no appellate brief has been received.

         When the appellant has failed to file a brief in the time prescribed, the Court may dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution, unless the appellant reasonably explains the failure and the appellee is not significantly injured by the appellant’s failure to timely file a brief. Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a)(1).

         On July 27, 2004, notice was given to all parties that this appeal was subject to dismissal pursuant to Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a)(1). Appellant was given ten days to explain why the cause should not be dismissed for failure to file a brief. To date, no appellate brief has been received.

         The Court, having examined and fully considered the documents on file, is of the opinion that the appeal should be dismissed for want of prosecution. The appeal is hereby DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION.

                                                               PER CURIAM


Memorandum Opinion delivered and filed

this the 9th day of December, 2004