Juan Ramos Salinas v. State

 

 

 

 

                              NUMBER 13-06-148-CR

 

                                 COURT OF APPEALS

 

                     THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

 

                         CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

__________________________________________________________  ___

 

JUAN RAMOS SALINAS,                                                                 Appellant,

 

                                                             v.

 

THE STATE OF TEXAS,                                                                    Appellee.

_____________________________________________________  ________

 

                             On appeal from the 156th District Court

                                           of Bee County, Texas.

______________________________________________________  _______

 

                               MEMORANDUM OPINION

                                                             

         Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Hinojosa and Garza

                                 Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

 

Appellant, JUAN RAMOS SALINAS, attempts to appeal a conviction for driving while intoxicated.  The trial court has certified that this Ais a plea-bargain case, and the defendant has NO right of appeal.@  See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(a)(2).


On March 30, 2006, this Court notified appellant=s counsel of the trial court=s certification and ordered counsel to: (1) review the record; (2) determine whether appellant has a right to appeal; and (3) forward to this Court, by letter, counsel=s findings as to whether appellant has a right to appeal, or, alternatively, advise this Court as to the existence of any amended certification.

On June 6, 2006, counsel filed a letter brief with this Court.  Counsel=s response does not establish (1) that the certification currently on file with this Court is incorrect or (2) that appellant otherwise has a right to appeal. 

The Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure provide that an appeal must be dismissed if the trial court=s certification does not show that the defendant has the right of appeal.  Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(d); see Tex. R. App. P. 37.1, 44.3, 44.4. Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed.  Any pending motions are denied as moot.

 

PER CURIAM

 

Do not publish. 

Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).

 

Memorandum Opinion delivered and filed

this the 13th day of July, 2006.