NUMBER 13-08-136-CV
COURT OF APPEALS
THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
CORPUS CHRISTI- EDINBURG
______________________________________________________________
IN RE: COLUMBIA VALLEY HEALTHCARE SYSTEM, L.P.
D/B/A VALLEY REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER _____________________________________________________________
On Petition for Writ of Mandamus
_____________________________________________________________
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Before Justices Yañez, Rodriguez, and Vela
Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam
Relator, Columbia Valley Healthcare System, L.P. d/b/a Valley Regional Medical Center, seeks a writ of mandamus to compel the trial judge, the Honorable Benjamin Euresti, Jr., presiding judge of the 107th Judicial District Court of Cameron County, Texas, and/or the presiding judge of the 404th District Court of Cameron County, (1) to vacate his February 7, 2008 order denying relator's Motion to Disqualify and Recuse counsel for real parties-in-interest, Magallanes & Hinojosa, P.C. ("the firm"), in trial court cause number 2006-06-2741-G in the 404th District Court of Cameron County, Texas. The trial court denied the relator's motion to disqualify after a hearing on February 7, 2008.
On April 8, 2008, real parties-in-interest (2) and the firm filed a response. On April 18, 2008, relator filed a Reply Brief in support of its petition for writ of mandamus.
We have reviewed the petition for writ of mandamus, response, reply, and record of the February 7, 2008 hearing. We conclude that the firm established that it took sufficient precautions to guard against any disclosure of confidences by its legal assistant, who was formerly employed by counsel for relator. (3) Accordingly, we conclude that the relator has not shown a clear abuse of discretion or violation of a duty imposed by law.
Relator's petition for writ of mandamus, filed March 13, 2008, is DENIED.
PER CURIAM
Memorandum Opinion delivered and filed
this the 6th day of November, 2008.
1. 2. Real parties-in-interest (plaintiffs below) are Yvonne T. Leal and Alberto B. Leal, Individually and
as next friends of Markus T. Leal, a minor.
3. See In re Amer. Home Prod. Corp., 985 S.W.2d 68, 75 (Tex. 1998) (orig. proceeding); Phoenix
Founders, Inc. v. Marshall, 887 S.W.2d 831, 835 (Tex. 1994) (orig. proceeding); Grant v. Thirteenth Court
of Appeals, 888 S.W.2d 466, 467 (Tex. 1994) (orig. proceeding).