Prentice Ware v. State









NUMBER 13-08-00425-CR



COURT OF APPEALS



THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS



CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG




PRENTICE WARE, Appellant,

v.



THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee.




On Appeal from the 36th District Court

of San Patricio County, Texas.




MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Chief Justice Valdez, Justices Rodriguez, and Benavides

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam



Appellant, Prentice Ware, attempts to appeal his conviction for aggravated robbery. The trial court has certified that this "is a plea-bargain case, and the defendant has NO right of appeal." See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(a)(2).

On July 7, 2008, this Court notified appellant's counsel of the trial court's certification and ordered counsel to: (1) review the record; (2) determine whether appellant has a right to appeal; and (3) forward to this Court, by letter, counsel's findings as to whether appellant has a right to appeal, or, alternatively, advise this Court as to the existence of any amended certification.

On September 25, 2008, counsel filed a letter brief with this Court. Counsel's response does not establish that the certification currently on file with this Court is incorrect or that appellant otherwise has a right to appeal.

The Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure provide that an appeal must be dismissed if the trial court's certification does not show that the defendant has the right of appeal. Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(d); see Tex. R. App. P. 37.1, 44.3, 44.4. Accordingly, this appeal is DISMISSED. Any pending motions are denied as moot.

PER CURIAM

Do not publish. See Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).



Memorandum Opinion delivered and

filed this the 2nd day of October, 2008.