NUMBER 13-08-299-CR
COURT OF APPEALS
THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG
IN RE ADOLFO CORTINAS
On Petition for Writ of Mandamus
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Garza and Benavides
Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion1
Relator, Adolfo Cortinas, pro se, filed a petition for writ of mandamus in the above
cause on May 12, 2008.2 The Court, having examined and fully considered the petition for
writ of mandamus, is of the opinion that relator has not shown himself entitled to the relief
sought. The petition generally fails to comply with Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 52.3
1
See T EX . R . A PP . P . 5 2 .8 (d ) (“W hen denying relief, the court m ay hand dow n an opinion but
is not required to do so.”); T EX . R . A PP . P . 47.4 (distinguishing opinions and m em orandum opinions).
2
On April 16, 2008, relator filed a separate, but sim ilar, pro se petition for writ of m andam us which
was denied by this Court. See In re Cortinas, No. 13-08-213-CR, 2008 Tex. App. LEXIS 2939, *1 (Tex.
App.–Corpus Christi Apr. 22, 2008, orig. proceeding) (m em . op.).
and fails to establish that the district court: (1) had a legal duty to perform a
nondiscretionary act, (2) was asked to perform the act, and (3) failed or refused to do so.
See In re Chavez, 62 S.W.3d 225, 228 (Tex. App.–Amarillo 2001, orig. proceeding).
Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus is DENIED. See TEX . R. APP. P. 52.8(a).
PER CURIAM
Do not publish. See T EX . R. A PP. P. 47.2(b).
Memorandum Opinion delivered and
filed this 23rd day of May, 2008.
2
3
in Re: Adolfo Cortinas
Combined Opinion