Eustacio Hernandez A/K/A Estacio Hernandez v. State

NUMBER 13-07-00760-CR COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG _______________________________________________________ EUSTACIO HERNANDEZ A/K/A ESTACIO HERNANDEZ, Appellant, v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee. _______________________________________ ________________ On Appeal from the 36th District Court of San Patricio County, Texas. _______________________________________________________ MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Rodriguez and Garza Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam Appellant, Eustacio Hernandez a/k/a Estacio Hernandez, attempts to appeal his conviction for driving under the influence. The trial court has certified that this “is a plea- bargain case, and the defendant has NO right of appeal,” and “the defendant has waived the right of appeal.” See TEX . R. APP. P. 25.2(a)(2). On December 31, 2007, this Court notified appellant’s counsel of the trial court’s certification and ordered counsel to: (1) review the record; (2) determine whether appellant has a right to appeal; and (3) forward to this Court, by letter, counsel’s findings as to whether appellant has a right to appeal, or, alternatively, advise this Court as to the existence of any amended certification. On January 30, 2008, counsel filed a letter brief with this Court. Counsel’s response does not establish that the certification currently on file with this Court is incorrect or that appellant otherwise has a right to appeal. The Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure provide that an appeal must be dismissed if the trial court’s certification does not show that the defendant has the right of appeal. TEX . R. APP. P. 25.2(d); see TEX . R. APP. P. 37.1, 44.3, 44.4. Accordingly, this appeal is DISMISSED. Any pending motions are denied as moot. PER CURIAM Do not publish. See TEX . R. APP. P. 47.2(b). Memorandum Opinion delivered and filed this the 13th day of March, 2008. 2