Affirmed and Opinion filed November 21, 2002.
In The
Fourteenth Court of Appeals
____________
NO. 14-02-00430-CR
____________
FELIX E. GUERRERO, Appellant
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
On Appeal from the 338th District Court
Harris County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No. 864,095
O P I N I O N
Appellant entered a plea of guilty to the offense of possession with intent to deliver at least 400 grams of cocaine. After a pre-sentence investigation report and a punishment hearing, on April 17, 2002, the trial court found appellant guilty and sentenced him to confinement for twenty-five years in the Institutional Division of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice and assessed a $1,000 fine. Appellant filed a pro se notice of appeal.
Appellant's appointed counsel filed a brief in which he concludes that the appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396 (1967), by presenting a professional evaluation of the record demonstrating why there are no arguable grounds to be advanced. See High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807 (Tex. Crim. App. 1978).
A copy of counsel=s brief was delivered to appellant. Appellant was advised of the right to examine the appellate record and file a pro se response. See Stafford v. State, 813 S.W.2d 503, 510 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991). As of this date, no pro se response has been filed.
We have carefully reviewed the record and counsel=s brief and agree that the appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit. Further, we find no reversible error in the record. A discussion of the brief would add nothing to the jurisprudence of the state.
Accordingly, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
PER CURIAM
Judgment rendered and Opinion filed November 21, 2002.
Panel consists of Chief Justice Brister and Justices Hudson and Fowler.
Do not publish C Tex. R. App. P. 47.3(b).