Affirmed and Opinion filed November 6, 2003.
In The
Fourteenth Court of Appeals
____________
NO. 14-03-00310-CR
NO. 14-03-00447-CR
____________
BRODERICK EARL DAVIS, Appellant
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
On Appeal from the 268th District Court
Fort Bend County, Texas
Trial Court Cause Nos. 32,865A & 32,867A
M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N
Appellant entered guilty pleas to two aggravated robbery offenses. On February 24, 2003, the trial court sentenced appellant in each case to confinement for thirty-five years in the Institutional Division of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice. Appellant filed a pro se notice of appeal for both cases.
Appellant=s appointed counsel filed briefs in which he concludes the appeals are wholly frivolous and without merit. The briefs meet the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396 (1967), by presenting a professional evaluation of the record demonstrating why there are no arguable grounds to be advanced. See High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807 (Tex. Crim. App. 1978).
Copies of counsel=s briefs were delivered to appellant. Appellant was advised of the right to examine the appellate records and file pro se responses. See Stafford v. State, 813 S.W.2d 503, 510 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991). To date, no pro se response has been filed.
We have carefully reviewed the records and counsel=s briefs and agree the appeals are wholly frivolous and without merit. Further, we find no reversible error in the records. A discussion of the briefs would add nothing to the jurisprudence of the state.
Accordingly, the judgments of the trial court are affirmed.
PER CURIAM
Judgment rendered and Memorandum Opinion filed November 6, 2003.
Panel consists of Chief Justice Brister and Justices Anderson and Seymore.
Do Not Publish C Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).