Affirmed and Opinion filed September 11, 2003.
In The
Fourteenth Court of Appeals
____________
NO. 14-02-01035-CR
NO. 14-02-01036-CR
____________
JOSHUA PRAYLOR, Appellant
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
On Appeal from the 176th District Court
Harris County, Texas
Trial Court Cause Nos. 906,916 & 906,917
M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N
Appellant entered a plea of not guilty to the offenses of evading arrest by motor vehicle and unauthorized use of a motor vehicle. The jury found appellant guilty and assessed punishment in each case. On September 24, 2002, the trial court sentenced appellant to confinement for ten years in the Institutional Division of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice in each case.
Appellant=s appointed counsel filed a brief in which he concludes the appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), by presenting a professional evaluation of the record demonstrating why there are no arguable grounds to be advanced. See High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807 (Tex. Crim. App. 1978).
A copy of counsel=s brief was delivered to appellant. Appellant was advised of the right to examine the appellate record and file a pro se response. See Stafford v. State, 813 S.W.2d 503, 510 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991). As of this date, no pro se response has been filed.
We have carefully reviewed the record and counsel=s brief and agree the appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit. Further, we find no reversible error in the record. A discussion of the brief would add nothing to the jurisprudence of the state.
Accordingly, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
PER CURIAM
Judgment rendered and Opinion filed September 11, 2003.
Panel consists of Justices Edelman, Frost, and Guzman.
Do Not Publish C Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).