Affirmed and Opinion filed May 8, 2003.
In The
Fourteenth Court of Appeals
____________
NO. 14-02-00916-CR
____________
DEBRA ANN HASKETT, Appellant
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
On Appeal from the 248th District Court
Harris County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No. 880,961
M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N
Appellant entered a plea of guilty to the offense of theft of property valued at less than $20,000. On September 14, 2001, the trial court sentenced appellant pursuant to a plea bargain agreement to confinement for two years in a state jail facility, probated for four years. The State subsequently moved to revoke appellant=s probation. Pursuant to another plea bargain agreement, on August 8, 2002, the court sentenced appellant to confinement for ten months in the State Jail Division of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice. Appellant filed a pro se notice of appeal.
Appellant=s appointed counsel filed a brief in which he concludes the appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, (1967), by presenting a professional evaluation of the record demonstrating why there are no arguable grounds to be advanced. See High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807 (Tex. Crim. App. 1978).
A copy of counsel=s brief was delivered to appellant. Appellant was advised of the right to examine the appellate record and file a pro se response. See Stafford v. State, 813 S.W.2d 503, 510 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991). As of this date, no pro se response has been filed.
We have carefully reviewed the record and counsel=s brief and agree the appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit. Further, we find no reversible error in the record. A discussion of the brief would add nothing to the jurisprudence of the state.
Accordingly, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
PER CURIAM
Judgment rendered and Memorandum Opinion filed May 8, 2003.
Panel consists of Chief Justice Brister and Justices Fowler and Edelman.
Do Not Publish C Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).