UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 15-6079
HENRY RAY DUNCAN, II,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
HAROLD CLARKE, Director of VA DOC, sued individually and in
official capacity; G. M. HINKLE, Warden, Greensville
Correctional Center, sued individually and in official
capacity; M. R. HANDSOME, Lieutenant, Greensville
Correctional Center, sued individually and in official
capacity,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, Senior
District Judge. (3:12-cv-00482-JRS)
Submitted: September 4, 2015 Decided: September 14, 2015
Before WILKINSON, KING, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Henry Ray Duncan, II, Appellant Pro Se. James Milburn Isaacs,
Jr., OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond,
Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Henry Ray Duncan, II, appeals the district court’s order
granting summary judgment to the Defendants and dismissing his
civil rights complaint. We review a district court’s order
granting summary judgment de novo, viewing the facts and drawing
reasonable inferences in the light most favorable to the
nonmoving party. Pender v. Bank of Am. Corp., 788 F.3d 354, 361
(4th Cir. 2015). Summary judgment is appropriate when “there is
no genuine dispute as to any material fact and the movant is
entitled to judgment as a matter of law.” Fed. R. Civ. P.
56(a). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the
district court. Duncan v. Clarke, No. 3:12-cv-00482-JRS (E.D.
Va. Jan. 6, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2