Petition for Writ of Mandamus Denied and Memorandum Opinion filed October 21, 2004.
In The
Fourteenth Court of Appeals
____________
NO. 14-04-00812-CV
____________
IN RE JOHN H. HOLLOWAY, Relator
ORIGINAL PROCEEDING
WRIT OF MANDAMUS
M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N
On August 23, 2004, relator filed a petition for writ of mandamus in this court. See Tex. Gov=t. Code Ann. ' 22.221 (Vernon 2004); see also Tex. R. App. P. 52. In his petition, relator seeks to have this court compel assigned Judge P.K. Reiter to conduct a hearing to determine the reasonableness of the court reporters= fees in the related underlying case.[1]
Relator has not established that he is entitled to mandamus relief. Accordingly, we deny relator=s petition for writ of mandamus.
PER CURIAM
Petition Denied and Memorandum Opinion filed October 21, 2004.
Panel consists of Chief Justice Hedges and Justices Fowler and Seymore.
[1] The underlying case is styled John H. Holloway v. Douglas Wohlfahrt and Lynn Wohlfahrt, in consolidated cause numbers 92-010589, 92-010590, and 92-010256, in the 129th District Court, Harris County, Texas. The Court of Appeals for the First District of Texas originally reversed the trial court=s judgment in favor of relator and remanded for a new trial. See Wohlfahrt v. Holloway, No. 01-99-00205-CV, 2001 WL 84212 (Tex. App.CHouston [1st Dist.] 2001, pet. denied) (not designated for publication). Relator has appealed the order on costs of the appeal in our case number 14-03-01130-CV, styled Holloway v. Wohlfhart. After a retrial, the court entered a judgment in favor of relator, and the Wohlfahrts have appealed in our case number 14-03-01084-CV, styled Wohlfahrt v. Holloway. The appeals remain pending before this court.