Affirmed and Memorandum Opinion filed September 2, 2004.
In The
Fourteenth Court of Appeals
____________
NO. 14-04-00063-CR
____________
DUANE GARCIA, Appellant
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
On Appeal from the 263rd District Court
Harris County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No. 951,060
M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N
After a bench trial, appellant was convicted of assault of a public servant and sentenced on January 26, 2004 to confinement for twenty-five years in the Institutional Division of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice. Appellant filed a written notice of appeal.
Appellant=s appointed counsel filed a brief in which he concludes the appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S. Ct. 1396 (1967), presenting a professional evaluation of the record demonstrating why there are no arguable grounds to be advanced. See High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807 (Tex. Crim. App. 1978).
A copy of counsel=s brief was delivered to appellant. Appellant was delivered a copy of the record to review but did not file a pro se response.
We agree the appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit. Further, we find no reversible error in the record. A discussion of the brief would add nothing to the jurisprudence of the State.
Accordingly, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
PER CURIAM
Judgment rendered and Memorandum Opinion filed September 2, 2004.
Panel consists of Justices Yates, Edelman, and Guzman.
Do Not Publish C Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).