in Re: John Worldpeace

Petition for Writ of Mandamus Denied and Memorandum Opinion filed June 29, 2004

Petition for Writ of Mandamus Denied and Memorandum Opinion filed June 29, 2004.

 

In The

 

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

 

NO. 14-04-00171-CV

____________

 

IN RE JOHN WORLDPEACE, Relator

 

 

 

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

WRIT OF MANDAMUS

 

 

M E M O R A N D U M   O P I N I O N

Relator John Worldpeace filed a petition for writ of mandamus in this court.  See Tex. Gov=t. Code Ann. ' 22.221 (Vernon Supp. 2004); see also Tex. R. App. P. 52.  In his petition, relator asserts the Honorable James R. Fry, who was assigned by the Texas Supreme Court to preside over a disciplinary proceeding against relator, abused his discretion by granting summary judgment on issues not raised in the Commission for Lawyer Discipline=s motion for summary judgment.[1]


Relator has not established he is entitled to extraordinary relief.  See Tex. R. App. P. 52.3, 52.7; Walker v. Packer, 827 S.W.2d 833, 839-40 (Tex. 1992).  Accordingly, we deny relator=s petition for writ of mandamus.

 

PER CURIAM

 

Petition Denied and Memorandum Opinion filed June 29, 2004.

Panel consists of Chief Justice Hedges and Justices Frost and Guzman.



[1]  The underlying action is styled Commission for Lawyer Discipline v. John Worldpeace, filed under cause number 2002-42081, in the 269th Judicial District Court of Harris County, Texas.  Relator=s appeal of his disbarment judgment is currently pending under this court=s appeal number 14-03-01339-CV.