Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed November 23, 2005.
In The
Fourteenth Court of Appeals
____________
NO. 14-05-00843-CV
____________
DELLA WEINBERGER AND THE SIDNEY AND DELLA WEINBERGER FAMILY TRUST, Appellants
V.
LARRY LONGER, Appellee
On Appeal from County Court at Law No. 1
Galveston County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No. 50,764
M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N
This is an attempted appeal from a temporary injunction signed June 30, 2005. Appellants= notices of appeal were filed August 18, 2005.
An appeal from an interlocutory order granting a temporary injunction is accelerated. Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code Ann. ' 51.014(a)(4) (Vernon Supp.2005); Tex. R. App. P. 28.1. Therefore, the notice of appeal must be filed within twenty days after the judgment or order is signed. See Tex. R. App. P. 26.1(b).
Appellants= notices of appeal were not timely filed. A motion for extension of time is necessarily implied when an appellant, acting in good faith, files a notice of appeal beyond the time allowed by rule 26.1, but within the fifteen-day grace period provided by Rule 26.3 for filing a motion for extension of time. See Verburgt v. Dorner, 959 S.W.2d 615, 617-18 9 (1997) (construing the predecessor to Rule 26). Appellant=s notice of appeal was not filed within the fifteen-day period provided by rule 26.3
On November 8, 2005, appellee filed a motion to dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction. Appellants have filed no response.
Accordingly, tT[wmf1] he appeal is ordered dismissed.
PER CURIAM
Judgment rendered and Memorandum Opinion filed November 23, 2005.
Panel consists of Justices Fowler, Edelman, and Guzman.
[wmf1]Deborah, I marked out the AAccordingly@ because I didn=t want to make it appear as if we were dismissing only because we received a motion to dismiss. It=s a minor point, but we=re dismissing mainly because he didn=t make either time deadline.