Affirmed and Memorandum Opinion filed January 20, 2005.
In The
Fourteenth Court of Appeals
____________
NO. 14-04-00949-CR
____________
EX PARTE GREGORY O=NEIL LOVE
On Appeal from the 180th District Court
Harris County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No. 996,362
M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N
This is an interlocutory appeal from the trial court=s denial of appellant=s pre-trial application for writ of habeas corpus seeking release from custody because of trial delay. See Tex. Code Crim. Proc. Ann. art. 17.151 (Vernon Supp. 2004-05). The trial court denied relief on August 26, 2004, and appellant filed a pro se notice of appeal.
Appellant=s appointed counsel filed a brief in which he concludes the appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S. Ct. 1396 (1967), presenting a professional evaluation of the record demonstrating why there are no arguable grounds to be advanced. See High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807 (Tex. Crim. App. 1978).
A copy of counsel=s brief was delivered to appellant. Appellant was advised of the right to examine the appellate record and file a pro se response. See Stafford v. State, 813 S.W.2d 503, 510 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991). As of this date, more than sixty days have elapsed and no pro se response has been filed.
We have carefully reviewed the record and counsel=s brief and agree the appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit. Further, we find no reversible error in the record. A discussion of the brief would add nothing to the jurisprudence of the state.
Accordingly, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
PER CURIAM
Judgment rendered and Memorandum Opinion filed January 20, 2005.
Panel consists of Chief Justice Hedges and Justices Fowler and Seymore.
Do Not Publish C Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).