Affirmed and Memorandum Opinion filed November 2, 2006.
In The
Fourteenth Court of Appeals
____________
NO. 14-06-00222-CR
____________
RENE ABRIL, Appellant
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
On Appeal from the 209th District Court
Harris County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No. 1042894
M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N
Rene Abril entered a plea of guilty to theft of property valued between $100,000 and $200,000 from an elderly individual. The trial court found him guilty and sentenced appellant to confinement for twenty years in the Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Institutional Division. In two issues, appellant claims his sentence of twenty years violates the prohibition against cruel and unusual punishment found in both the United States= constitution and the constitution of the State of Texas.
As this court has held, these complaints are not preserved for appellate review unless they are raised in the trial court. See Jagaroo v. State, 180 S.W.3d 793, 802 (Tex.App. B Houston [14th Dist.] 2005, ). See also Tex. R. App. P. 33.1(a); Curry v. State, 910 S.W.2d 490, 497 (Tex.Crim.App.1995) (holding cruel and unusual punishment complaint not preserved); Nicholas v. State, 56 S.W.3d 760, 768 (Tex.App.‑Houston [14th Dist.] 2001, pet. ref'd) (holding "[t]he constitutional right to be free from cruel and unusual punishment may be waived."). The record does not reflect appellant made any objection at trial to the imposition of his sentence, nor did appellant file a motion for new trial challenging his sentence. Consequently, appellant=s arguments were not preserved for our review. See Nicholas, 56 S.W.3d at 768. Issues one and two are overruled.
Accordingly, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
PER CURIAM
Judgment rendered and Memorandum Opinion filed November 2, 2006.
Panel consists of Justices Fowler, Edelman, and Frost.
Do Not Publish C Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).