Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed July 13, 2006.
In The
Fourteenth Court of Appeals
____________
NO. 14-06-00588-CR
____________
JOSE TREVINO GONZALEZ AKA JOSE GUILLERMO RAMIREZ, Appellant
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
On Appeal from the 185th District Court
Harris County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No. 991,180
M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N
Appellant entered a guilty plea to possession with intent to deliver. In accordance with the terms of a plea bargain agreement with the State, the trial court sentenced appellant on August 30, 2004, to confinement for twenty-five years in the Institutional Division of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice and assessed a fine of $10,000. No timely motion for new trial was filed. Appellant=s pro se notice of appeal was not filed until June 28, 2006.
A defendant=s notice of appeal must be filed within thirty days after sentence is imposed when the defendant has not filed a motion for new trial. See Tex. R. App. P. 26.2(a)(1). A notice of appeal which complies with the requirements of Rule 26 is essential to vest the court of appeals with jurisdiction. Slaton v. State, 981 S.W.2d 208, 210 (Tex. Crim. App. 1998). If an appeal is not timely perfected, a court of appeals does not obtain jurisdiction to address the merits of the appeal. Under those circumstances it can take no action other than to dismiss the appeal. Id.
Moreover, the trial court entered a certification of the defendant=s right to appeal in which the court certified that this is a plea bargain case, and the defendant has no right of appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(a)(2). The trial court=s certification is included in the record on appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(d). The record supports the trial court=s certification. See Dears v. State, 154 S.W.3d 610, 615 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005).
Accordingly, the appeal is ordered dismissed.
PER CURIAM
Judgment rendered and Memorandum Opinion filed July 13, 2006.
Panel consists of Justices Hudson, Fowler, and Seymore.
Do Not Publish C Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).