Affirmed and Memorandum Opinion filed January 31, 2006.
In The
Fourteenth Court of Appeals
____________
NO. 14-05-00275-CR
____________
DAVID MAURICE GRICE, Appellant
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
On Appeal from the 232nd District Court
Harris County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No. 996,055
M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N
After a jury trial, appellant was found guilty of the offense of aggravated robbery and was sentenced on March 10, 2005, to confinement for 22 years in the Institutional Division of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice. Appellant filed a pro se notice of appeal.
Appellant=s appointed counsel filed a brief in which he concludes the appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S. Ct. 1396 (1967), presenting a professional evaluation of the record demonstrating why there are no arguable grounds to be advanced. See High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807 (Tex. Crim. App. 1978).
A copy of counsel=s brief was delivered to appellant. Appellant was advised of the right to examine the appellate record and file a pro se response. See Stafford v. State, 813 S.W.2d 503, 510 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991). The record was forwarded to appellant, and the deadline for the pro se response was December 19, 2005. As of this date, no pro se response has been filed.
We have carefully reviewed the record and counsel=s brief and agree the appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit. Further, we find no reversible error in the record. A discussion of the brief would add nothing to the jurisprudence of the state.
Accordingly, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
PER CURIAM
Judgment rendered and Memorandum Opinion filed January 31, 2006.
Panel consists of Justices Hudson, Frost and Seymore.
Do Not Publish C Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).