Affirmed and Memorandum Opinion filed November 29, 2007.
In The
Fourteenth Court of Appeals
____________
NO. 14-07-00439-CR
NO. 14-07-00440-CR
____________
MARCUS DAVIS, Appellant
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
On Appeal from the 338th District Court
Harris County, Texas
Trial Court Cause Nos. 1081472 & 1082529
M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N
After a jury trial, appellant was convicted of being a felon in possession of a firearm and assault of a family member. On May 21, 2007, the trial court sentenced appellant to confinement for thirty-five years in the Institutional Division of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice in each case, with the sentences to be served concurrently. Appellant filed a notice of appeal in each case.
Appellant=s appointed counsel filed a brief in each case in which he concludes the appeals are wholly frivolous and without merit. The briefs meet the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S. Ct. 1396 (1967), by presenting a professional evaluation of the records and demonstrating why there are no arguable grounds to be advanced. See High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807, 811-12 (Tex. Crim. App. 1978).
Copies of counsel=s briefs were delivered to appellant. Appellant was advised of the right to examine the appellate records and file a pro se response. See Stafford v. State, 813 S.W.2d 503, 510 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991). As of this date, more than sixty days has elapsed and no pro se response has been filed.
We have carefully reviewed the records and counsel=s briefs and agree the appeals are wholly frivolous and without merit. See Bledsoe v. State, 178 S.W.3d 824, 827-28 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005). Further, we find no reversible error in the records. A discussion of the briefs would add nothing to the jurisprudence of the state.
Accordingly, the judgments of the trial court are affirmed.
PER CURIAM
Judgment rendered and Memorandum Opinion filed November 29, 2007.
Panel consists of Chief Justice Hedges and Justices Anderson and Seymore.
Do Not Publish C Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).