Affirmed and Memorandum Opinion filed October 18, 2007.
In The
Fourteenth Court of Appeals
____________
NO. 14-06-01131-CR
____________
JAMES PATRICK LAMB, Appellant
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
On Appeal from the 339th District Court
Harris County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No. 991283
M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N
Appellant entered a guilty plea to the offense of murder. In accordance with the terms of a plea bargain agreement with the State, the trial court deferred adjudication and placed appellant under community supervision for seven years. Subsequently, the State moved to adjudicate guilt. Appellant pled true to the State=s motion and the trial court sentenced appellant on November 29, 2006, to confinement for fifty years in the Institutional Division of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice. Appellant filed a notice of appeal.
Appellant=s appointed counsel filed a brief in which he concludes the appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S. Ct. 1396 (1967), presenting a professional evaluation of the record demonstrating why there are no arguable grounds to be advanced. See High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807 (Tex. Crim. App. 1978).
A copy of counsel=s brief was delivered to appellant. Appellant was advised of the right to examine the appellate record and file a pro se response. See Stafford v. State, 813 S.W.2d 503, 510 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991). At appellant=s request, the record was provided to him. On August 10, 2007, appellant filed a pro se response to counsel=s brief.
We have carefully reviewed the record, counsel=s brief, and appellant=s response, and agree the appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit. Further, we find no reversible error in the record. A discussion of the brief would add nothing to the jurisprudence of the state. We are not to address the merits of each claim raised in an Anders brief or a pro se response when we have determined there are no arguable grounds for review. See Bledsoe v. State, 178 S.W.3d 824, 827-28 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005).
Accordingly, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
PER CURIAM
Judgment rendered and Memorandum Opinion filed October 18, 2007.
Panel consists of Chief Justice Hedges, Justices Yates and Frost.
Do Not Publish C Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).