Petition for Writ of Mandamus Denied and Memorandum Opinion filed February 20, 2007.
In The
Fourteenth Court of Appeals
____________
NO. 14-07-00062-CV
____________
IN RE DAVID ROSE AND DANA ROSE,
Relators
ORIGINAL PROCEEDING
WRIT OF MANDAMUS
M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N
On February 6, 2007, relators, David Rose and Dana Rose, filed a petition for writ of mandamus in this court, requesting we compel the Honorable Reece Rondon, presiding judge of the 234th District Court, Harris County, Texas, to vacate rulings on real party-in-interest=s motion for partial summary judgment, relators= motion to continue real party=s motion for partial summary judgment, and order respondent to hear the motion for partial summary judgment after the start of trial in the underlying case. See Tex. Gov=t Code Ann. ' 22.221 (Vernon 2004); see also Tex. R. App. P. 52.1.
Relators have failed to establish that the trial court=s rulings are an abuse of discretion for which they
have no adequate remedy by appeal. See In re Ford Motor Co., 165 S.W.3d 315, 317 (Tex. 2005).
Accordingly, we deny relators= petition for writ of mandamus.
PER CURIAM
Petition Denied and Memorandum Opinion filed February 20, 2007.
Panel consists of Justices Yates, Anderson, and Hudson.