Petition for Writ of Mandamus Denied and Memorandum Opinion filed January 18, 2007.
In The
Fourteenth Court of Appeals
____________
NO. 14-06-01060-CV
____________
IN RE STRATEGIC IMPACT CORPORATION, KIM O. BRASCH,
and MARIA C. FLOUDAS, Relators
ORIGINAL PROCEEDING
WRIT OF MANDAMUS
M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N
Relators, Strategic Impact Corporation, Kim O. Brasch, and Maria C. Floudas, filed a petition for writ of mandamus in this court, seeking an order compelling respondent, the Honorable Tony Lindsay, presiding judge of the 280th District Court, Harris County, Texas, to produce all non-privileged documents in her possession, which she reviewed in camera pursuant to our previous opinion, dated October 10, 2006.[1] See Tex. Gov=t Code Ann. ' 22.221 (Vernon 2004); see also Tex. R. App. P. 52.
Relators contend mandamus relief is proper, arguing that Judge Lindsay abused her discretion by withholding non-privileged documents and that there is no adequate remedy by appeal. After reviewing the matter, we conclude that relators have failed to establish they are entitled to mandamus relief. Accordingly, we deny relators= petition for writ of mandamus.
PER CURIAM
Petition Denied and Memorandum Opinion filed January 18, 2007.
Panel consists of Chief Justice Hedges, Justices Fowler and Seymore.
[1]See In re Strategic Impact Corp., No. 14-06-00727-CV, 14-06-00750-CV, 2006 WL 2862738 (Tex. App.CHouston [14th Dist.] Oct. 10, 2006, orig. proceeding) (mem. op).