Camilo D. Maldonado v. State

Affirmed and Memorandum Opinion filed December 11, 2008

Affirmed and Memorandum Opinion filed December 11, 2008.

 

In The

 

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

 

NO. 14-08-00459-CR

____________

 

CAMILO D. MALDONADO, Appellant

 

V.

 

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

 

 

On Appeal from the 178th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 1084327

 

 

M E M O R A N D U M   O P I N I O N

Appellant entered a plea of guilty to the offense of possession with intent to deliver over 400 grams of cocaine.  After a pre-sentence investigation, on March 12, 2008, the trial court sentenced appellant to confinement for thirty-five years in the Institutional Division of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice.  Appellant filed a timely notice of appeal.


Appellant=s appointed counsel filed a brief in which he concludes the appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit.  The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S. Ct. 1396 (1967), by presenting a professional evaluation of the record and demonstrating why there are no arguable grounds to be advanced.  See High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807, 811-12 (Tex. Crim. App. 1978).

A copy of counsel=s brief was delivered to appellant.  Appellant was advised of the right to examine the appellate record and file a pro se response.  See Stafford v. State, 813 S.W.2d 503, 510 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991).  The record was furnished to appellant, and appellant was granted two extensions of time to file his pro se response.  As of this date, more than sixty days has passed since the response was due, and no pro se response has been filed.

We have carefully reviewed the record and counsel=s brief and agree the appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit.  See Bledsoe v. State, 178 S.W.3d 824, 827-28 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005).  Further, we find no reversible error in the record.  A discussion of the brief would add nothing to the jurisprudence of the state. 

Accordingly, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

 

PER CURIAM

 

Judgment rendered and Memorandum Opinion filed December 11, 2008.

Panel consists of Chief Justice Hedges and Justices Anderson and Seymore. 

Do Not Publish C Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).