Petition for Writ of Mandamus Denied and Memorandum Opinion filed August 6, 2009.
In The
Fourteenth Court of Appeals
____________
NO. 14-09-00627-CR
____________
IN RE LAWRENCE MCQUEEN, Relator
ORIGINAL PROCEEDING
WRIT OF MANDAMUS
M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N
On July 16, 2009, relator, Lawrence McQueen, filed a petition for writ of mandamus in this court. See Tex. Gov=t Code Ann. ' 22.221 (Vernon 2004); see also Tex. R. App. P. 52. In the petition, relator states that he has filed a motion, and supplemental motion, to recuse the Honorable Debbie Mantooth Stricklin, presiding judge of the 180th District Court of Harris County, from his habeas corpus proceeding. Relator complains that Judge Stricklin has neither ruled on his motions to recuse nor referred them to another judge for a ruling pursuant to Rule 18a of the Texas Rules of Civil Procedure. See Tex. R. Civ. P. 18a.[1] Therefore, relator requests that we compel Judge Stricklin to either rule on his motions to recuse or to refer them to another judge for a ruling.
Relator=s petition does not comply with the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. Relator has not provided a sworn or certified record with his petition, including his motions to recuse. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.7(a)(1) (requiring relator to file certified or sworn copy of every document that is material to his claim for relief). Relator further has not filed an affidavit of indigence with his petition as required by Rule 20.1. See Tex. R. App. P. 20.1; see also In re Chavez, 62 S.W.3d 225, 228 (Tex. App.CEl Paso 2001, orig. proceeding) (stating that appellate court will not consider petition without affidavit of indigence).
Relator has not established his entitlement to the extraordinary relief of a writ of mandamus. Accordingly, we deny relator=s petition for writ of mandamus.
PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Justices Seymore, Brown, and Sullivan.
Do Not PublishCTex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).
[1] Rule 18a=s procedures for recusal of judges apply in criminal cases. De Leon v. Aguilar, 127 S.W.3d 1, 5 (Tex. Crim. App. 2004). AWhen a recusal motion is timely filed, Rule 18a leaves a trial judge with no discretionCthe trial judge must either recuse himself or refer the motion for another judge to decide.@ Id.