IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS
OF TEXAS
NO. WR-59,466-01
EX PARTE DALE DEVON SCHEANETTE
ON APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS IN CAUSE
NO. C-4-006948-0854220-A IN THE CRIMINAL DISTRICT COURT FOUR
TARRANT COUNTY
Per Curiam.
O R D E R
This is a post conviction application for writ of habeas corpus filed pursuant to the provisions of Texas Code of Criminal Procedure article 11.071.
On January 8, 2003, a jury convicted applicant of the offense of capital murder. The jury answered the special issues submitted pursuant to Texas Code of Criminal Procedure article 37.071, and the trial court, accordingly, set punishment at death. This Court affirmed applicant=s conviction and sentence on direct appeal. Scheanette v. State, 144 S.W.3d 503 (Tex. Crim. App. 2004), cert. denied, 125 S. Ct. 872 (2005).
Applicant presents twenty-nine allegations in his application in which he challenges the validity of his conviction and resulting sentence.[1] Although an evidentiary hearing was not held, the trial judge entered findings of fact and conclusions of law. The trial court recommended that relief be denied.
This Court has reviewed the record with respect to the allegations made by applicant. We adopt the trial judge=s findings and conclusions. Based upon the trial court=s findings and conclusions and our own review, the relief sought is denied.
IT IS SO ORDERED THIS THE 9TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2005.
Do Not Publish
[1] Applicant also filed a lengthy pro se document in which he set out, among other things, alleged errors and argument he wanted included in his habeas application. However, applicant is not entitled to hybrid representation, therefore this Court will not consider any of the claims set out in this document. Ex parte Taylor, 36 S.W.3d 883, 887 (Tex. Crim. App. 2001).