IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS
OF TEXAS
FROM JEFFERSON COUNTY
O P I N I O N
Applicant, pro se, asserts that: 1) he is being improperly denied time credit on his convictions for unauthorized use of a motor vehicle and felony criminal mischief for time that he spent in custody pursuant to a parole revocation warrant; and 2) that he was given only five months jail-time credit after being returned from parole, when he was entitled to six months credit plus "ISF Incarceration credits." Applicant also contends that he is being denied "street-time" credit for time spent on mandatory supervision. His claim alleges that he is entitled to such credit pursuant to Ex parte Spann, 132 S.W.3d 390, 392 (Tex. Crim. App. 2004), but the state is incorrectly treating him as if he has a prior first- or second-degree-felony conviction for aggravated assault, when, in fact, his previous conviction was for a third-degree aggravated assault. The trial court's findings of fact and conclusions of law include a recommendation "that all relief sought by [applicant] be denied without a hearing." The trial court did not conduct a hearing.
An affidavit from an administrative assistant to the State Classification Committee for the Texas Department of Criminal Justice-correctional institutions division (TDCJ-CID) is included in the record. Attached to the affidavit is a letter from the affiant that details applicant's confinement and release on his current sentences and the bases for the TDCJ's calculation of applicant's time credits. The affidavit states that applicant was received by TDCJ on June 28, 1991, on two 12-year, concurrent sentences from Jefferson County for unauthorized use of a motor vehicle and felony criminal mischief, both with a sentence begin date of January 10, 1991. The affidavit, which was sworn to and subscribed on December 8, 2004, concludes by stating that applicant "remains on mandatory supervision status with a 6-21-05 maximum expiration date."
TDCJ-CID has confirmed that applicant discharged his sentence on May 25, 2005. Therefore, applicant's writ application is dismissed as moot.
Johnson, J.
En banc
Delivered: June 29, 2005
Do not publish