Cisneros, Ramon

















IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS




NO. WR-66,221-01


EX PARTE RAMON CISNEROS, Applicant


ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NO. 9786 IN THE 118TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT

FROM HOWARD COUNTY


Per curiam.

O R D E R



Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of murder and sentenced to seventeen years, six months' imprisonment.

Applicant contends that he was denied the opportunity to appeal his conviction, because he was never informed of his appellate rights, notice of appeal was not timely filed, and appellate counsel was never appointed.

Applicant has alleged facts that, if true, might entitle him to relief. Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 608 (1984); Ex parte Lemke, 13 S.W.3d 791,795-96 (Tex. Crim. App. 2000). In these circumstances, additional facts are needed. As we held in Ex parte Rodriguez, 334 S.W.2d 294, 294 (Tex. Crim. App. 1997), the trial court is the appropriate forum for findings of fact. The trial court shall provide counsel with the opportunity to respond to Applicant's claim that he abandoned Applicant after his conviction. The trial court may use any means set out in Tex. Code Crim. Proc. art. 11.07, § 3(d). In the appropriate case, the trial court may rely on its personal recollection. Id.

If the trial court elects to hold a hearing, it shall determine whether Applicant is indigent. If Applicant is indigent and wishes to be represented by counsel, the trial court shall appoint an attorney to represent Applicant at the hearing. Tex. Code Crim. Proc. art. 26.04.

The trial court shall make findings of fact first as to whether Applicant was properly informed of his appellate rights, and if so, whether Applicant ever expressed a desire to appeal this conviction. If Applicant did express a desire to appeal the conviction, the court shall make findings as to whether appellate counsel was ever appointed to represent Applicant on appeal. If no appellate counsel was appointed, the court shall make findings as to whether trial counsel was permitted to withdraw from the representation, and if so, when. The trial court shall make findings as to whether trial counsel filed either a motion for a new trial or a notice of appeal, and if not, why not. Finally, the trial court shall make findings as to whether Applicant was denied his right to a meaningful appeal because Applicant's counsel failed to timely file a notice of appeal. The trial court shall also make any other findings of fact and conclusions of law that it deems relevant and appropriate to the disposition of Applicant's claim for habeas corpus relief.

This application will be held in abeyance until the trial court has resolved the fact issues. The issues shall be resolved within 90 days of this order. If any continuances are granted, a copy of the order granting the continuance shall be sent to this Court. A supplemental transcript containing all affidavits and interrogatories or the transcription of the court reporter's notes from any hearing or deposition, along with the trial court's supplemental findings of fact and conclusions of law, shall be returned to this Court within 120 days of the date of this order. Any extensions of time shall be obtained from this Court.



Filed: November 22, 2006



Do not publish