Jimenez, Jose Rodolfo















IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS




NO. 44,942-02


EX PARTE JOSE RODOLFO JIMINEZ, Applicant


ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

FROM CAUSE NO. A03-389-1

IN THE 216TH DISTRICT COURT OF KERR COUNTY


Per curiam.



O R D E R



This is an application for a writ of habeas corpus which was transmitted to this Court pursuant to the provisions of Tex. Code Crim. Proc. art. 11.07. Applicant was convicted of the offense of possession of a controlled substance, and punishment was assessed at sixteen years' confinement. Applicant's conviction was affirmed on appeal. Jiminez v. State, No. 04-04-00614-CR (Tex. App. --San Antonio, delivered April 6, 2005, no pet.).

Applicant contends that he received ineffective assistance of counsel and was denied his right to file a petition for discretionary review. Specifically, Applicant contends counsel was ineffective for failing to file supporting affidavits with the motion for new trial. Further, Applicant asserts that counsel did not inform him in a timely manner that his conviction was affirmed, thus denying him the opportunity to file a petition for discretionary review.

The trial court has not entered findings of fact or conclusions of law. We believe that Applicant has alleged facts that, if true, might entitle him to relief. Therefore, it is this Court's opinion that additional facts need to be developed and because this Court does not hear evidence, the trial court is the appropriate forum. The trial court shall resolve those issues as set out in Tex. Code Crim. Proc. art. 11.07, § 3 (d), in that it shall order an affidavit from counsel, Harold J. Danford, or it may order a hearing. In the appropriate case the trial court may also rely on its personal recollection.

If the trial court elects to hold a hearing, the court shall first decide whether Applicant is indigent. If the trial court finds that Applicant is indigent and Applicant desires to be represented by counsel, the trial court will then, pursuant to the provisions of Tex. Code Crim. Proc. art. 26.04, appoint an attorney to represent him at the hearing.

Following receipt of additional information, the trial court shall make findings of fact as to whether Applicant received ineffective assistance of counsel and whether Applicant was denied his right to file a petition for discretionary review. The trial court shall also make any further findings of fact and conclusions of law it deems relevant and appropriate to the disposition of the application for writ of habeas corpus.

Because this Court does not hear evidence, Ex Parte Rodriquez, 334 S.W.2d 294 (Tex. Crim. App. 1960), this application for a post-conviction writ of habeas corpus will be held in abeyance pending the trial court's compliance with this order. Resolution of the issues shall be accomplished by the trial court within 90 days of the date of this order. (1) A supplemental transcript containing all affidavits or the transcription of the court reporter's notes from any hearing, along with the trial court's supplemental findings of fact and conclusions of law, shall be returned to this Court within 120 days of the date of this order. (2)

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS THE 14th DAY OF JUNE, 2006.



EN BANC

DO NOT PUBLISH

1.

In the event any continuances are granted, copies of the order granting the continuance shall be provided to this Court.

2.

Any extensions of this time period shall be obtained from this Court.