Grant, George Daniel

















IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS




NOS. WR-67,277-01, -02 & -03


EX PARTE GEORGE DANIEL GRANT, Applicant


ON APPLICATIONS FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NOS. 93-41138, 93-41533 & 98-01839

IN CRIMINAL DISTRICT COURT NO. 3

FROM DALLAS COUNTY


Per curiam.

O R D E R



Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court these applications for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of two counts of aggravated sexual assault of a child and one count of indecency with a child. He was sentenced to imprisonment for two terms of forty years and one term of twenty years. The Fifth Court of Appeals dismissed his appeals. Grant v. State, Nos. 05-05-00920-CR, 05-05-00921-CR, 05-05-00922-CR (Tex. App.-Dallas, delivered July 21, 2005, pet. ref'd).

Applicant contends, among other things, that he was denied his right to appeal as a result of invalid appeal waivers at his adjudication of guilt proceeding. The trial court found that Applicant had waived his right to appeal, and recommended that we deny relief. We believe, however, that the record is not sufficient to resolve (1) whether Applicant waived his right to appeal before or after he was sentenced; and (2) whether Applicant's waivers were voluntary, intelligent, and knowing. See Ex parte Delaney, 207 S.W.3d 794 (Tex. Crim. App. 2006); Monreal v. State, 99 S.W.3d 615 (Tex. Crim. App. 2003). In these circumstances, additional facts are needed. As we held in Ex parte Rodriguez, 334 S.W.2d 294, 294 (Tex. Crim. App. 1997), the trial court is the appropriate forum for findings of fact. The trial court may use any means set out in Tex. Code Crim. Proc. art. 11.07, § 3(d). In the appropriate case, the trial court may rely on its personal recollection. Id.

If the trial court elects to hold a hearing, it shall determine whether Applicant is indigent. If Applicant is indigent and wishes to be represented by counsel, the trial court shall appoint an attorney to represent him at the hearing. Tex. Code Crim. Proc. art. 26.04.

The trial court shall make further findings of fact and conclusions of law on whether Applicant's waivers of appeal were voluntary. The trial court shall also make any other findings of fact and conclusions of law that it deems relevant and appropriate to the disposition of Applicant's claim for habeas corpus relief.

These applications will be held in abeyance until the trial court has resolved the fact issues. The issues shall be resolved within 90 days of this order. If any continuances are granted, a copy of the order granting the continuance shall be sent to this Court. A supplemental transcript containing all affidavits and interrogatories or the transcription of the court reporter's notes from any hearing or deposition, along with the trial court's supplemental findings of fact and conclusions of law, shall be returned to this Court within 120 days of the date of this order. Any extensions of time shall be obtained from this Court.





Filed: June 20, 2007

Do not publish