Samet, Joseph Daniel







IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS




NO. PD 1035-08



 

JOSEPH D. SAMET, Appellant


v.


THE STATE OF TEXAS




ON APPELLANT’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW

FROM THE TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS

SMITH COUNTY


           



           Per curiam. Keasler and Hervey, JJ., dissent.


ORDER

           The petition for discretionary review violates Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.3(b), because the original petition is not accompanied by eleven (11) copies.

            The petition also violates Rule of Appellate Procedure 68.4(i), because it does not contain a copy of the opinion of the court of appeals.

           The petition is struck. See Rule of Appellate Procedure 68.6.

           The petitioner may redraw the petition. The redrawn petition and copies must be filed in the Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas within thirty (30) days after the date of this order.

En banc.


Delivered: November 26, 2008.

Do Not Publish.