Alba, John Avalos

Summarize
Check Treatment

Related Cases



















IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS



NO. WR-36,711-04

EX PARTE JOHN AVALOS ALBA

ON APPLICATION FOR ORIGINAL WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

IN CAUSE NO. W219-81215-91 FROM THE 199TH DISTRICT COURT

COLLIN COUNTY

Per Curiam. Price, J., dissents for the reasons stated in his dissenting statement in Ex parte Chamberlain. Johnson, J., dissents for the reasons stated in her opinions in Ex parte Alba and Ex parte Chi. Holcomb, J., dissents.

ORDER



We have before us an original application for writ of habeas corpus, a motion for leave to file that application, and a motion to seal the application and accompanying exhibits. Applicant asserts his execution will violate his Eighth Amendment right against cruel and unusual punishment.

Applicant was convicted of capital murder in May 1992 and sentenced to death. This Court affirmed the conviction and sentence on direct appeal. Alba v. State, 905 S.W.2d 581 (Tex. Crim. App. 1995). Pursuant to Article 11.071, on April 8, 1997, applicant filed in the trial court his initial application for writ of habeas corpus. We denied relief. Ex parte Alba, No. WR-36,711-01 (Tex. Crim. App. Apr. 15, 1998)(not designated for publication). Applicant's sentence was later vacated by the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit. Alba v. Johnson, 232 F.3d 308 (5th Cir. 2000). At the conclusion of applicant's second trial on punishment, applicant was sentenced to death. On appeal, this Court affirmed the judgment. Alba v. State, No. AP-71,487 (Tex. Crim. App. Apr. 16, 2003)(not designated for publication). Pursuant to Article 11.071, on February 14, 2003, applicant filed in the trial court his initial application for writ of habeas corpus pertaining to his new punishment trial. We denied relief. Ex parte Alba, No. WR-36,711-02 (Tex. Crim. App. Oct. 15, 2003)(not designated for publication). On July 24, 2006, we received applicant's first subsequent writ in which applicant asserted that the execution protocol used in Texas would violate his Eighth Amendment right prohibiting the infliction of cruel and unusual punishment. We filed and set the case but ultimately dismissed it holding that such a claim was not cognizable under Article 11.071. Ex parte Alba, S.W.3d , No. AP-75,510 (Tex. Crim. App. June 9, 2008).

On July 14, 2008, applicant moved this Court for leave to file this original application for writ of habeas corpus. Applicant also requested that we file the actual application and accompanying exhibits under seal. We have considered his request, and we shall seal his application and accompanying exhibits. Leave to file the application is denied.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS THE 24TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2008.

Do Not Publish