IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS
OF TEXAS
NO. AP-75,843
EX PARTE JAMES DOUGLAS HARRIS, Applicant
ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS
CAUSE NO. 10960-A-1 IN THE 77 TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT
FROM LIMESTONE COUNTY
Per curiam.
OPINION
Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the
clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte
Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of aggravated
perjury and sentenced to thirty-four years’ imprisonment.
Applicant contends that he was denied the right to appeal this conviction, because counsel
failed to timely file a notice of appeal. The trial court has not entered findings of fact and
conclusions of law, but the habeas records reflects that Applicant’s direct appeal was dismissed for
want of jurisdiction, because the notice of appeal was not filed within 90 days after the date sentence
was imposed in open court. The appellate opinion indicates that counsel filed an Anders brief in
which counsel conceded that the notice of appeal was untimely. Harris v. State, No. 10-06-00384-
CR (Tex. App. - Waco, November 14, 2007, no pet). We find, therefore, that Applicant is entitled
to the opportunity to file an out-of-time appeal of the judgment of conviction in Cause No. 10960-A-
1 from the 77th Judicial District Court of Limestone County. Applicant is ordered returned to that
time at which he may give a written notice of appeal so that he may then, with the aid of counsel,
obtain a meaningful appeal. All time limits shall be calculated as if the sentence had been imposed
on the date on which the mandate of this Court issues. We hold that, should Applicant desire to
prosecute an appeal, he must take affirmative steps to file a written notice of appeal in the trial court
within 30 days after the mandate of this Court issues.
Delivered: February 13, 2008
Do Not Publish