Proctor, Dennis Randy

















IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS




NO. WR-67,386-02


EX PARTE DENNIS RANDY PROCTOR, Applicant


ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NO. 150135-CR IN THE 349TH DISTRICT COURT

FROM HOUSTON COUNTY


Per curiam.

O R D E R



Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of retaliation and sentenced to three (3) years' imprisonment.

Applicant alleges that he was arrested pursuant to a parole revocation warrant on July 17, 2008, but has not been given a preliminary parole revocation hearing. He alleges that due process requires that a preliminary hearing be held "as promptly as convenient" after a parolee has been arrested to "determine whether there is probable cause or reasonable ground to believe that the arrested parolee has committed the acts that would constitute a violation of parole conditions." Morrissey v. Brewer, 408 U.S. 471, 485, (1972); See also Ex parte Cordova, 235 S.W.3d 735 (Tex. Crim. App. 2007).

Applicant has alleged facts which, if true, could entitle him to relief. In these circumstances, additional facts are needed. As we held in Ex parte Rodriguez, 334 S.W.2d 294, 294 (Tex. Crim. App. 1997), the trial court is the appropriate forum for findings of fact. The trial court may use any means set out in Tex. Code Crim. Proc. art. 11.07, § 3(d) to resolve the fact issues. In the appropriate case, the trial court may rely on its personal recollection. Id. The trial court shall order the Texas Department of Criminal Justice's Office of General Counsel to file an affidavit addressing whether Applicant has been given a preliminary parole revocation hearing and, if so, when the hearing was held. If no hearing has been held, the affidavit shall address why Applicant has not been given a preliminary parole revocation hearing. The affidavit shall also identify the date(s) of any scheduled hearings.

If the trial court elects to hold a hearing, it shall determine whether Applicant is indigent. If Applicant is indigent and wishes to be represented by counsel, the trial court shall appoint an attorney to represent Applicant at the hearing. Tex. Code Crim. Proc. art. 26.04.

The trial court shall make findings of fact as to whether Applicant has promptly been given a preliminary hearing to determine whether there is probable cause or reasonable ground to believe that he committed the acts that would constitute a violation of parole conditions. Specifically, the trial court shall make findings of fact as to whether the TDCJ has given Applicant a preliminary hearing and, if so, the date the hearing was held. If Applicant has not given a preliminary hearing, the trial court shall make findings of fact as to why the TDCJ has not given Applicant a hearing. The trial court shall also make any other findings of fact as to whether any parole revocation hearings have been scheduled. The trial court shall also make any other findings of fact and conclusions of law that it deems relevant and appropriate to the disposition of Applicant's claim for habeas corpus relief.

This application will be held in abeyance until the trial court has resolved the fact issues. The issues shall be resolved within 90 days of this order. If any continuances are granted, a copy of the order granting the continuance shall be sent to this Court. A supplemental transcript containing all affidavits and interrogatories or the transcription of the court reporter's notes from any hearing or deposition, along with the trial court's supplemental findings of fact and conclusions of law, shall be returned to this Court within 120 days of the date of this order. Any extensions of time shall be obtained from this Court.

Filed: June 10, 2009

Do not publish