Ramos, Ricardo Jr.

















IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS




NO. WR-73,675-01


EX PARTE RICARDO RAMOS, JR. , Applicant


ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NO. 07-03-06016-MCRAJA IN THE 365TH DISTRICT COURT

FROM MAVERICK COUNTY


Per curiam.

O R D E R



Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of burglary of a habitation and sentenced to nine years' imprisonment. He did not appeal his conviction.

Applicant contends that his plea was involuntary because his plea bargain contemplated that he would be bench warranted back to the trial court to be considered for "shock probation," but that the trial court lost jurisdiction before Applicant could be brought back to Maverick County. Tex. Code Crim. Proc. art. 42.12 § 6. Applicant has alleged facts that, if true, might entitle him to relief. Ex parte Austin, 746 S.W.2d 226 (Tex. Crim. App. 1988). In these circumstances, additional facts are needed. As we held in Ex parte Rodriguez, 334 S.W.2d 294, 294 (Tex. Crim. App. 1997), the trial court is the appropriate forum for findings of fact. The trial court may use any means set out in Tex. Code Crim. Proc. art. 11.07, § 3(d). In the appropriate case, the trial court may rely on its personal recollection. Id.

It appears that Applicant is represented by counsel. If the trial court determines he is not represented by counsel and elects to hold a hearing, it shall then determine whether Applicant is indigent. If Applicant is indigent and wishes to be represented by counsel, the trial court shall appoint an attorney to represent Applicant at the hearing. Tex. Code Crim. Proc. art. 26.04.

The trial court shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law in regard to Applicant's claim that his plea was involuntary. Specifically, the trial court shall determine whether "shock" probation was part of the plea agreement and, if so, whether performance of the plea agreement has subsequently become impossible. The trial court shall also make any other findings of fact and conclusions of law that it deems relevant and appropriate to the disposition of Applicant's claim for habeas corpus relief.

This application will be held in abeyance until the trial court has resolved the fact issues. The issues shall be resolved within 90 days of this order. If any continuances are granted, a copy of the order granting the continuance shall be sent to this Court. A supplemental transcript containing all affidavits and interrogatories or the transcription of the court reporter's notes from any hearing or deposition, along with the trial court's supplemental findings of fact and conclusions of law, shall be returned to this Court within 120 days of the date of this order. Any extensions of time shall be obtained from this Court.







Filed: May 5, 2010

Do not publish