IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS
OF TEXAS
NO. AP-76,342
EX PARTE CHRIS TURAN HAWKINS, Applicant
ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS
CAUSE NO. 1112966 IN THE 232ND DISTRICT COURT
FROM HARRIS COUNTY
Per curiam.
O P I N I O N
Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of aggravated robbery and sentenced to thirty five years’ imprisonment. The Fourteenth Court of Appeals affirmed his conviction. Hawkins v. State, No. 14-07-00381-CR (Tex. App.–Houston [14th Dist.] delivered September 25, 2008).
Applicant contends that his appellate counsel rendered ineffective assistance because counsel failed to timely notify Applicant that his conviction had been affirmed and failed to timely advise him of his right to petition for discretionary review pro se. Appellate counsel filed an affidavit with the trial court. Based on that affidavit, the trial court has entered findings of fact and conclusions of law that appellate counsel failed to timely notify Applicant that his conviction had been affirmed and failed to timely advise him of his right to petition for discretionary review pro se. The trial court recommends that relief be granted. Ex parte Wilson, 956 S.W.2d 25 (Tex. Crim. App. 1997). We find, therefore, that Applicant is entitled to the opportunity to file an out-of-time petition for discretionary review of the judgment of the Fourteenth Court of Appeals in Cause No. 14-07-00381-CR that affirmed his conviction in Case No. 1112966 from the 232nd Judicial District Court of Harris County. Applicant shall file his petition for discretionary review with the Fourteenth Court of Appeals within 30 days of the date on which this Court’s mandate issues. Applicant’s remaining claims are dismissed. Ex parte Torres, 943 S.W.2d 469, 472 (Tex. Crim. App. 1997).
Delivered: May 5, 2010
Do not publish