IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS
OF TEXAS
NO. AP-76,306
EX PARTE DANIEL PATRICK HOWARD, Applicant
ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS
CAUSE NO. F-0155310-I IN CRIMINAL DISTRICT COURT NO. 2
FROM DALLAS COUNTY
Per curiam.
O P I N I O N
Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of capital murder and sentenced to life imprisonment. The Fifth Court of Appeals affirmed his conviction. Howard v. State, No. 05-02-01731-CR (Tex. App.–Dallas 2003, no pet.).
Applicant contends that his appellate counsel rendered ineffective assistance because he failed to timely notify Applicant that his conviction had been affirmed. The trial court made findings of fact and concluded that through no fault of appellate counsel Applicant was denied his right to file a pro se petition for discretionary review. The trial court recommends that relief be granted. We find, therefore, that Applicant is entitled to the opportunity to file an out-of-time petition for discretionary review of the judgment of the Fifth Court of Appeals in Cause No. 05-02-01731-CR that affirmed his conviction in Case No. F-0155310-I from Criminal District Court No. 2 of Dallas County. Applicant shall file his petition for discretionary review with the Fifth Court of Appeals within 30 days of the date on which this Court’s mandate issues. Applicant’s other claims are dismissed. Ex parte Torres, 943 S.W.2d 469 (Tex. Crim. App. 1997).
Delivered: March 3, 2010
Do not publish