IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS
OF TEXAS
NO. AP-76,614
EX PARTE EARL THOMPSON, Applicant
ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS
CAUSE NO. 1091097 IN THE 263rd DISTRICT COURT
FROM HARRIS COUNTY
Per curiam.
OPINION
Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the
clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte
Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of stalking and
sentenced to five years’ imprisonment. The Fourteenth Court of Appeals affirmed his conviction.
Thompson v. State, No. 14-08-00481-CR (Tex. Crim. App.–Houston [14th Dist.], delivered May 19,
2009).
Applicant contends that his appellate counsel rendered ineffective assistance because counsel
failed to advise him of his right to file petition for discretionary review pro se.
2
Appellate counsel filed an affidavit with the trial court. Based on that affidavit, the trial court
has entered findings of fact and conclusions of law that appellate counsel failed to advise him of his
right to petition for discretionary review pro se. The trial court recommends that relief be granted.
Ex parte Wilson, 956 S.W.2d 25 (Tex. Crim. App. 1997). We find, therefore, that Applicant is
entitled to the opportunity to file an out-of-time petition for discretionary review of the judgment of
the Fourteenth Court of Appeals in Cause No. 14-08-00481-CR that affirmed his conviction in Case
No. 1091097 from the 263rd Judicial District Court of Harris County. Applicant shall file his
petition for discretionary review with this Court within 30 days of the date on which this Court’s
mandate issues.
Delivered: August 24, 2011
Do not publish