Romero, Ex Parte Jose Antonio

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS NO. AP-76,931 EX PARTE JOSE ANTONIO ROMERO, Applicant ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS CAUSE NO. 2007-CR-9123B IN THE 399th DISTRICT COURT FROM BEXAR COUNTY Per curiam. OPINION Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of injury to a child and sentenced to fifty-five years’ imprisonment. The Fourth Court of Appeals affirmed his conviction. Romero v. State, No. 04-08-00014-CR (Tex. App.–San Antonio, delivered February 25, 2009, no pet.). Applicant contends, inter alia, that his appellate counsel rendered ineffective assistance because counsel failed to timely notify Applicant that his conviction had been affirmed and failed to advise him of his right to petition pro se for discretionary review. 2 Appellate counsel filed an affidavit with the trial court. Based on that affidavit, the trial court has entered findings of fact and conclusions of law that appellate counsel failed to timely notify Applicant that his conviction had been affirmed and failed to advise him of his right to petition for discretionary review pro se. The trial court recommends that relief be granted. Ex parte Wilson, 956 S.W.2d 25 (Tex. Crim. App. 1997). We find, therefore, that Applicant is entitled to the opportunity to file an out-of-time petition for discretionary review of the judgment of the Fourth Court of Appeals in Cause No. 04-08-00014- CR that affirmed his conviction in Cause No. 2007-CR-9123B from the 399th District Court of Bexar County. Applicant shall file his petition for discretionary review with this Court within 30 days of the date on which this Court’s mandate issues. The Applicant’s remaining claims are dismissed. Ex parte Torres, 943 S.W.2d 469 (Tex. Crim. App. 1997). Delivered: December 19, 2012 Do not publish